To die like a dog!

"To die like a dog!" "Dying or even die like a dog" means, unequivocal person, a miserable death, abandoned by everyone when "killed like a dog" comes to indicate that this killing will be no mercy. Is it still a dead dog can be so miserable ...? Today as yesterday Throughout history, humans have booked a lot unequal to canine species, but he has consistently used its formidable and numerous provisions (even more unlikely!) By making it pay the price of his life. Dogs have been used among others and several centuries, as real drugs. Here, against the drop on putting plasters fat dog ... then called on to apply the skin of dogs against the itch, or on treating migraines with a small dog warm and open, placed on the head of the patient like a hot water bottle ...? The list may still lie the deaths of dogs to serve humans, because our days also, fellow appreciated often dies miserably as an object of experience. On the starving, the drugs, mutilation, even throw in the garbage alive. Unfortunately today, there is not that these poor animals that are subject to a miserable death as victims of vivisection in research laboratories called "core" The dog loved the family, became simply "bulky" can also be put to death in full prime of life, provided that the legal forms are observed. The shoot itself may lead to prosecution, but this murder to entrust a company called "protection" or to an association called "welfare" of the same animal, is socially tolerated. I speak dog removed, "quilted" not because they are handicapped by old age or a serious disease, causing suffering that will inevitably lead to the fatal outcome. For those, I speak of euthanasia, according to this theory that it is permissible to shorten the life of an incurable, to spare him suffering. No, I am talking about the murder of these dogs aggressive, destructive, at least as much qu'inexpliqués side. Their masters, often unable to get involved in taking the measure of their responsibility for disorderly conduct of their animal, chose not to keep them, preferring to think that "it is the fault of the dog" Where are the responsibilities? Any behavior is always an answer to what is experienced by the subject in their daily lives, and therefore can not be performed in the relational context in which it appears. So today, can we still believe that a dog be alone, dangerous, destructive or fearful? and that his teachers may not be for anything? Even if they have acquired a poorly socialized puppy during its first 8 weeks of life, and that it is incapable of any learning, their responsibility is great anyway. Before any acquisition, learn about the criteria for choosing a puppy is common sense, like checking the foundation to the breeder that we have chosen. Puppies who did not receive the stimuli for their development on their livestock are unfortunately still offered for sale. These young animals may be frightened by anything new or agitated, mordilleurs to excess, even aggressive when they are brought into contact with humans or congeners. Incapable of learning (or almost) these puppies quickly beyond their masters including some professionals consulted. The responsibility is collective, that is both inconsistent future teachers who continue to regard the dog as an object, buy and inquire about her without good preparation for family life, than some super markets of the animal or indélicats breeders ... Be responsible and concerted acquisition of a properly socialized puppy from a breeder of quality, is not provided. It is then up to the teacher to give his pet, the best living conditions and development, and first in respect of the social codes of its own. If the proposed rules of life to animals are changing, even non-existent! disorderly behavior of any kind (symptoms of adjustment difficulties) are quick to appear on everyone's surprise. Some rituals priority access to food or space management and interaction, for example, are reducing ambiguity for the dog and foster harmonious relations. Do not take the trouble to learn, apply and for what purposes is exposed to establish a relationship based solely on the ideas where there is anthropomorphism. According to family contexts, misunderstanding of the dog's lack of teachers, the relationship may deteriorate and lead to conflicts, with an animal now it seems unmanageable. These are erroneous interpretations of their behavior, expectations reckless, antagonistic roles sometimes impossible to fulfill, and anthropocentrism in general, which led to these dogs of wrongdoing for their masters. Too much of these are likely to quickly develop or medicalising the animal, as far as quick to believe that everything has been tried. They "forget" to think that trying to understand and change their model of relationship, often avoiding the conclusion that there is more to "break" with the death of the animal became unmanageable "by them" ( if possible with the blessing of the professional!) So much of these dogs end up there this death hypocritically called "euthanasia" and that I find much miserable.